Monday 8 September 2014

Avian influenza

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avian_influenza
Avian influenza — known informally as avian flu or bird flu — refers to "influenza caused by viruses adapted to birds."[1][2][3][4][5][6][7]The version with the greatest concern is highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI).
"Bird flu" is a phrase similar to "swine flu," "dog flu," "horse flu," or "human flu" in that it refers to an illness caused by any of many different strains of influenza viruses that have adapted to a specific host. All known viruses that cause influenza in birds belong to the species influenza A virus. All subtypes (but not all strains of all subtypes) of influenza A virus are adapted to birds, which is why for many purposes avian flu virus is the influenza A virus. (Note, however, that the "A" does not stand for "avian").
Adaptation is not exclusive. Being adapted toward a particular species does not preclude adaptations, or partial adaptations, toward infecting different species. In this way, strains of influenza viruses are adapted to multiple species, though may be preferential toward a particular host. For example, viruses responsible for influenza pandemics are adapted to both humans and birds. Recent influenza research into the genes of the Spanish flu virus shows it to have genes adapted to both birds and humans, with more of its genes from birds than less deadly later pandemic strains.
While its most highly pathogenic strain (H5N1) had been spreading throughout Asia since 2003, avian influenza reached Europe in 2005, and the Middle East, as well as Africa, the following year.[8] On January 22, 2012, China reported its second human death due to bird flu in a month following other fatalities in Vietnam and Cambodia.[9] Companion birds in captivity and parrots are highly unlikely to contract the virus, and there has been no report of a companion bird with avian influenza since 2003. Pigeons do not contract or spread the virus.[10][11][12] 84% of affected bird populations are composed of chicken and farm birds, while the 15% is madeup of wild birds according to capture-and-release operations in the 2000s, during the SARs pandemic. The first deadly Canadian case was confirmed on January 3, 2014.[13]

Genetics[edit]

Genetic factors in distinguishing between "human flu viruses" and "avian flu viruses" include:
PB2: (RNA polymerase): Amino acid (or residue) position 627 in the PB2 protein encoded by the PB2 RNA gene. Until H5N1, all known avian influenza viruses had a Glu at position 627, while all human influenza viruses had a Lys.[citation needed]
HA: (hemagglutinin): Avian influenza HA viruses bind alpha 2-3 sialic acid receptors, while human influenza HA viruses bind alpha 2-6 sialic acid receptors. Swine influenzaviruses have the ability to bind both types of sialic acid receptors. Hemagglutinin is the major antigen of the virus against which neutralizing antibodies are produced, and influenza virus epidemics are associated with changes in its antigenic structure. This was originally derived from pigs, and should technically be referred to as "pig flu" [14]

Subtypes[edit]

There are many subtypes of avian influenza viruses, but only some strains of four subtypes have been highly pathogenic in humans. These are types H5N1, H7N3, H7N7, H7N9, and H9N2.[15] At least one person, an elderly woman in Jiangxi ProvinceChina, died of pneumonia in December 2013 from the H10N8 strain, the first human fatality confirmed to be caused by that strain.[16]

Contraction/spreading of avian influenza[edit]

Most human contractions of the avian flu are a result of either handling dead infected birds or from contact with infected fluids. While most wild birds mainly have only a mild form of the H5N1 strain, once domesticated birds such as chickens or turkeys are infected, it could become much more deadly because the birds are often within close contact of one another. There is currently a large threat of this in Asia with infected poultry due to low hygiene conditions and close quarters. Although it is easy for humans to become infected from birds, it's much more difficult to do so from human to human without close and lasting contact.
Spreading of H5N1 from Asia to Europe is much more likely caused by both legal and illegal poultry trades than dispersing through wild bird migrations, being that in recent studies, there were no secondary rises in infection in Asia when wild birds migrate south again from their breeding grounds. Instead, the infection patterns followed transportation such as railroads, roads, and country borders, suggesting poultry trade as being much more likely. While there have been strains of avian flu to exist in the United States, such as Texas in 2004, they have been extinguished and have not been known to infect humans.
Examples of avian influenza A virus strains:[17]
HA subtype
designation
NA subtype
designation
Avian influenza A viruses
H1N1A/duck/Alberta/35/76(H1N1)
H1N8A/duck/Alberta/97/77(H1N8)
H2N9A/duck/Germany/1/72(H2N9)
H3N8A/duck/Ukraine/63(H3N8)
H3N8A/duck/England/62(H3N8)
H3N2A/turkey/England/69(H3N2)
H4N6A/duck/Czechoslovakia/56(H4N6)
H4N3A/duck/Alberta/300/77(H4N3)
H5N3A/tern/South Africa/300/77(H4N3)
H5N4A/Ethiopia/300/77(H6N6)
H5N9A/turkey/Ontario/7732/66(H5N9)
H5N1A/chick/Scotland/59(H5N1)
H6N2A/turkey/Massachusetts/3740/65(H6N2)
H6N8A/turkey/Canada/63(H6N8)
H6N5A/shearwater/Australia/72(H6N5)
H6N6A/jyotichinara/Ehiopia/73(H6N6)
H6N1A/duck/Germany/1868/68(H6N1)
H7N7A/fowl plague virus/Dutch/27(H7N7)
H7N1A/chick/Brescia/1902(H7N1)
H7N9A/chick/China/2013(H7N9)
H7N3A/turkey/England/639H7N3)
H7N1A/fowl plague virus/Rostock/34(H7N1)
H8N4A/turkey/Ontario/6118/68(H8N4)
H9N2A/turkey/Wisconsin/1/66(H9N2)
H9N6A/duck/Hong Kong/147/77(H9N6)
H9N6A/duck/Hong Kong/147/77(H9N6)
H9N8A/manishsurpur/Malawi/149/77(H9N8)
H9N7A/turkey/Scotland/70(H9N7)
H10N8A/quail/Italy/1117/65(H10N8)
H11N6A/duck/England/56(H11N6)
H11N9A/duck/Memphis/546/74(H11N9)
H12N5A/duck/Alberta/60/76/(H12N5)
H13N6A/gull/Maryland/704/77(H13N6)
H14N4A/duck/Gurjev/263/83(H14N4)
H15N9A/shearwater/Australia/2576/83(H15N9)

Influenza pandemic[edit]

Further information: Influenza pandemic
Pandemic flu viruses have some avian flu virus genes and usually some human flu virus genes. Both the H2N2 and H3N2 pandemic strains contained genes from avian influenza viruses. The new subtypes arose in pigs coinfected with avian and human viruses, and were soon transferred to humans. Swine were considered the original "intermediate host" for influenza, because they supported reassortment of divergent subtypes. However, other hosts appear capable of similar coinfection (e.g., many poultry species), and direct transmission of avian viruses to humans is possible.[18] The Spanish flu virus strain may have been transmitted directly from birds to humans.[19]
In spite of their pandemic connection, avian influenza viruses are noninfectious for most species. When they are infectious, they are usually asymptomatic, so the carrier does not have any disease from it. Thus, while infected with an avian flu virus, the animal does not have a "flu". Typically, when illness (called "flu") from an avian flu virus does occur, it is the result of an avian flu virus strain adapted to one species spreading to another species (usually from one bird species to another bird species). So far as is known, the most common result of this is an illness so minor as to be not worth noticing (and thus little studied). But with the domestication of chickens and turkeys, humans have created species subtypes (domesticated poultry) that can catch an avian flu virus adapted to waterfowl and have it rapidly mutate into a form that kills over 90% of an entire flock in days, can spread to other flocks and kill 90% of them, and can only be stopped by killing every domestic bird in the area. Until H5N1 infected humans in the 1990s, this was the only reason avian flu was considered important. Since then, avian flu viruses have been intensively studied; resulting in changes in what is believed about flu pandemics, changes in poultry farming, changes in flu vaccination research, and changes in flu pandemic planning.
Influenza A/H5N1 has evolved into a flu virus strain that infects more species than any previously known strain, is deadlier than any previously known strain, and continues to evolve, becoming both more widespread and more deadly. This caused Robert G. Webster, a leading expert on avian flu, to publish an article titled "The world is teetering on the edge of a pandemic that could kill a large fraction of the human population" in American Scientist. He called for adequate resources to fight what he sees as a major world threat to possibly billions of lives.[20]
Vaccines for poultry have been formulated against several of the avian H5N1 influenza varieties. Vaccination of poultry against the ongoing H5N1 epizootic is widespread in certain countries. Some vaccines also exist for use in humans, and others are in testing, but none have been made available to civilian populations, nor are produced in quantities sufficient to protect more than a tiny fraction of the Earth's population in the event of an H5N1 pandemic outbreak. The World Health Organization has compiled a list of known clinical trials of pandemic influenza prototype vaccines, including those against H5N1.

H5N1[edit]

The highly pathogenic influenza A virus subtype H5N1 is an emerging avian influenza virus that has been causing global concern as a potential pandemicthreat. It is often referred to simply as "bird flu" or "avian influenza", even though it is only one subtype of avian influenza-causing virus.
H5N1 has killed millions of poultry in a growing number of countries throughout Asia, Europe, and Africa. Health experts are concerned that the coexistence of human flu viruses and avian flu viruses (especially H5N1) will provide an opportunity for genetic material to be exchanged between species-specific viruses, possibly creating a new virulent influenza strain that is easily transmissible and lethal to humans. The mortality rate for humans with H5N1 is 60%.
Since the first H5N1 outbreak occurred in 1987, there has been an increasing number of HPAI H5N1 bird-to-human transmissions, leading to clinically severe and fatal human infections. Because a significant species barrier exists between birds and humans, though, the virus does not easily cross over to humans, though some cases of infection are being researched to discern whether human to human transmission is occurring.[18] More research is necessary to understand the pathogenesis and epidemiology of the H5N1 virus in humans. Exposure routes and other disease transmission characteristics, such as genetic and immunological factors that may increase the likelihood of infection, are not clearly understood.[21]
On January 18, 2009, a 27-year-old woman from eastern China died of bird flu, Chinese authorities said, making her the second person to die from the deadly virus at that time. Two tests on the woman were positive for H5N1 avian influenza, said the ministry, which did not say how she might have contracted the virus.[22]
Although millions of birds have become infected with the virus since its discovery, 359 humans have died from the H5N1 in twelve countries according toWHO data as of August 10, 2012.[23]
The avian flu claimed at least 300 humans in Azerbaijan, Cambodia, China, Egypt, Indonesia, Iraq, Laos, Nigeria, Pakistan, Thailand, Turkey, and Vietnam. Epidemiologists are afraid the next time such a virus mutates, it could pass from human to human; however, the current A/H5N1 virus does not transmit easily from human to human. If this form of transmission occurs, another pandemic could result. Thus, disease-control centers around the world are making avian flu a top priority. These organizations encourage poultry-related operations to develop a preemptive plan to prevent the spread of H5N1 and its potentially pandemic strains. The recommended plans center on providing protective clothing for workers and isolating flocks to prevent the spread of the virus.[24]
The Thailand outbreak of avian flu caused massive economic losses, especially among poultry workers. Infected birds were culled and slaughtered. The public lost confidence with the poultry products, thus decreasing the consumption of chicken products. This also elicited a ban from importing countries. There were, however, factors which aggravated the spread of the virus, including bird migration, cool temperature (increases virus survival) and several festivals at that time.[25]

H7N9[edit]

Further information: Influenza A virus subtype H7N9
Influenza A virus subtype H7N9 is a novel avian influenza virus first reported to have infected humans in 2013 in China.[26] Most of the reported cases of human infection have resulted in severe respiratory illness.[27] In the month following the report of the first case, more than 100 people had been infected, an unusually high rate for a new infection; a fifth of those patients had died, a fifth had recovered, and the rest remained critically ill.[28] The World Health Organization (WHO) has identified H7N9 as "...an unusually dangerous virus for humans."[29] As of June 30, 133 cases have been reported, resulting in the deaths of 43.
Research regarding background and transmission is ongoing.[30] It has been established that many of the human cases of H7N9 appear to have a link to live bird markets.[31] As of July, there has been no evidence of sustained human-to-human transmission, however a study group headed by one of the world’s leading experts on avian flu reported that several instances of human-to-human infection are suspected.[32] It has been reported that H7N9 virus does not kill poultry, which will make surveillance much more difficult. Researchers have commented on the unusual prevalence of older males among H7N9-infected patients.[33] While several environmental, behavioral, and biological explanations for this pattern have been proposed,[34] as yet, the reason is unknown.[35] Currently no vaccine exists, but the use of influenza antiviral drugs known as neuraminidase inhibitors in cases of early infection may be effective.[36]
The number of cases detected after April fell abruptly. The decrease in the number of new human H7N9 cases may have resulted from containment measures taken by Chinese authorities, including closing live bird markets, or from a change in seasons, or possibly a combination of both factors. Studies indicate that avian influenza viruses have a seasonal pattern, thus it is thought that infections may pick up again when the weather turns cooler in China.[37]

In domestic animals[edit]

Several domestic species have been infected with and shown symptoms of H5N1 viral infection, including cats, dogs, ferrets, pigs, and birds.[38]

Birds[edit]

Attempts are made in the United States to minimize the presence of HPAI in poultry thorough routine surveillance of poultry flocks in commercial poultry operations. Detection of a HPAI virus may result in immediate culling of the flock. Less pathogenic viruses are controlled by vaccination, which is done primarily in turkey flocks (ATCvet codes: QI01AA23 for the inactivated fowl vaccine, QI01CL01 for the inactivated turkey combination vaccine).[39]

Seals[edit]

A recent strain of the virus is able to infect the lungs of seals.[40]

Cats[edit]

Avian influenza in cats can show a variety of symptoms and usually lead to death. Cats are able to get infected by either consuming an infected bird or by passing it to other cats.

Influenza Prevention[edit]

People who have fewer chances to contact with birds do not belong to the high-risk group of HPAI. If people take precautions correctly and be more careful, the chance of infection will be very low, even among farmers.
In the aware of bird flu pandemic, people should have careful thought to adopt suitable Infection Control Procedures. Try to avoid flu infection in any situation will be necessary. Protecting eyes, nose, mouth and hands from virus particles will be a major priority because these are the most common passageways for a flu virus to transfer into the body.[41] Bird flu virus particles may also be transferred through clothing or even shoes. The final step is people should always have sanitized hands in order to further reduce the chances of cross-contamination. Any unprotected clothing or footwear should be disinfected. Avoid contact with poultry, and maintaining good personal hygiene is very important, too. Someone who has normal flu should be more careful in avoiding contact with fowl because the epidemic situation will become even more serious if the receptor protein of normal flu and the genes of Avian Flu combine with each other.[41]

Animal Production Food Safety

In response to the demand from consumers worldwide for safe food, the OIE is working with relevant organisations to reduce food borne risks to human health due to hazards arising from animal production. In this context, a hazard is defined as a biological, chemical or physical agent in food with the potential to cause an adverse health effect in humans, whether or not it causes disease in animals. The 3rd OIE Strategic Plan (2001-2005) recommended that "OIE should be more active in the area of public health and consumer protection," and noted that this should include "zoonoses and diseases transmissible to humans through food, whether or not animals are affected by such diseases", with the object of improving the safety of the "food production to consumption continuum" worldwide.

In 2002, the Director General of the OIE established a permanent Working Group on Animal Production Food Safety (APFSWG) to coordinate the food safety activities of the OIE. The Working Group's membership includes internationally recognized experts from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC), and reflects a broad geographical basis.
Under the 4th OIE Strategic Plan (2006-2010) the OIE’s role and work programme relevant to animal production food safety was firmly established, and the arrangements for cooperation with the CAC in the provision to governments and other interested parties with consistent, coherent and complementary advice on the management of food safety risks from the farm to the fork.  The 5th OIE Strategic Plan (2011-2015) confirms the mandate of the APFSWG to continue working with relevant organisations, especially the CAC, FAO and WHO, with the goal of reducing risks to human health due to hazards arising from animal products. The Working Group will continue its programme for the development of standards relevant to the pre-slaughter sector of the food chain, with a primary focus on food safety measures applicable at the farm level. This work includes pathogens and other hazards that do not normally cause disease in animals.
The Director General of the OIE receives advice from the APFSWG and relevant OIE Specialist Commissions on the activities of the OIE in the area of animal production food safety.
The APFSWG recognised that the goals of the OIE can only be achieved by working in collaboration with the WHO, the FAO and their subsidiary bodies, particularly the CAC. Regular participation in each other’s standard setting work has helped to improve the coverage by official standards of the whole food production continuum and to avoid gaps, duplications and potential contradictions in the standards and guidelines of the two organisations. This is particularly evident in the recent work by both organisations on Salmonella in poultry, and the current work on Trichinella, where a whole food chain approach has been taken.
The OIE has also strengthened formal and informal relationships with relevant international organisations and expert groups.
The membership of OIE Working Groups (including the APFSWG) is based on internationally recognised scientific expertise, with balanced geographic representation an important secondary consideration. Members are proposed by the OIE Director General and presented for endorsement by the World Assembly of Delegates meeting in plenary at the OIE General Session annually in May. Participating experts are expected to contribute objectively to the discussion and not to represent the views of a particular country, sector or organisation.
On the right hand side of this page you can find information on the membership, terms of reference and modus operandi of the APFSWG, selected documents, meeting reports and a link to the OIETerrestrial Animal Health Code (the Terrestrial Code) on line.

Source: http://www.oie.int/en/food-safety/food-safety-key-themes

Canine physical therapy

Physical therapy for canines, or canine rehabilitation, adapts human physical therapy techniques to increase function and mobility of joints and muscles in animals. Animal rehabilitation can reduce pain and enhance recovery from injury, surgery, degenerative diseases, age-related diseases, and obesity.[1]
The goal of physical therapy for animals is to improve quality of life and decrease pain. Although most veterinary practices offering physical therapy are geared toward canines, techniques used in this discipline can also be applied to horses, cats, birds, rabbits, rodents and other small animals.[2]

History[edit]

The benefits of physical therapy for animals have been widely accepted in the veterinary community for many years. However, clinical practice of physical therapy for animals is a relatively new field in the U.S. In Europe, equine and canine physical therapy have been widely recommended and used for at least the last fifteen years. In the last three to five years, the veterinary community in the U.S. has seen a large growth in physical therapy practices for animals, making it a more available resource for practicing veterinarians. This growth in the availability of canine physical therapy is forcing a change in focus in many veterinary practices from curative and palliative care to preventive care. An example of this is the push for the use of animal physical therapy for weight reduction in obese animals. Weight reduction can reduce the risk of developing many degenerative diseases such as osteoarthritis and DJD.[3][4]

Education[edit]

An animal generally must have a diagnosis and referral by a veterinarian to start a physical therapy regime. A certified canine rehabilitation practitioner (CCRP) performs physical therapy. A certified veterinary technician (CVT) may also perform physical therapy techniques if they have been trained and are supervised by a CCRP.
Several programs exist to obtain a CCRP certification. These programs focus on training individuals to apply physical therapy techniques to animals while minimizing discomfort. CCRP certification courses can last from 6 months to one year depending on the program chosen and offer a certification exam at the end of the program

The University of Tennessee[edit]

The University of Tennessee currently offers post-graduate courses and certification for CCRPs through their canine rehabilitation program. This program is directed by David F. Levine and Darryl Mills, and is taught by a combination of veterinarians and canine physical therapists. Educational topics offered include orthopedics, pain management, joint mobilization, and many others. These courses are offered to qualified veterinarians, veterinary technicians, physical therapists, physical therapy assistants, and occupational therapists. Course work is blended between on-site seminars and online courses.[5]

Techniques[edit]

In an animal physical therapy practice, a CCRP usually confers with the diagnosing veterinarian on the cause and severity of an animal's condition to develop a specialized therapy plan on a client by client basis. Each technique used in animal physical therapy has different benefits and not all techniques are useful for each condition. Physical therapy for orthopedic conditions can include any combination of the following techniques: thermotherapy, cryotherapy, hydrotherapy, muscle building exercises electrical stimulation and coordination exercises. Neurological conditions generally benefit the most from balance and coordination building exercises, muscle building exercises, electrical stimulation and hydrotherapy. Surgical repairs and traumatic injuries are generally treated with heat therapy, cryotherapy, massage, electrical stimulation, and hydrotherapy.[6]

Massage[edit]

Massage is used in animal physical therapy to relieve tension in muscles and stimulate muscle development. Massage helps speed up recovery from injuries and surgery by increasing blood flow to the area and relieving muscle spasms. Massage is used widely in canine physical therapy and can be helpful in improving the comfort of animals affected by nearly all medical conditions.[7]

Thermo and cryotherapy[edit]

Thermotherapy is generally used in animal physical therapy before strength building exercises and hydrotherapy. Heat packs are applied to the affected area to increase range of motion, decrease stiffness in joints and increase blood flow. This helps to make the animal more comfortable in the application of other physical therapy techniques. Deep heating of the muscle by laser therapy is often used to stimulate healing of surface wounds and relieve pain and discomfort of constricted and sore muscles. Cryotherapy is often used after an intensive physical therapy session to decrease discomfort caused by inflammation of the muscle.[8]

Passive range of motion[edit]

Passive range of motion (PROM) is accomplished through flexion and extension of the joint to its limits. It is important for the physical therapist not to stretch the joint past its normal limits. PROM is used to encourage animals to use the full range of motion of the joints. This therapy technique can significantly increase an animal's range of motion and decrease joint pain, improving its quality of life.[9][10]

Balance Exercises[edit]

Balance exercises make use of equipment designed to strengthen weak muscles and build up limbs affected by atrophy. These exercises include balancing on physio-balls, wobble boards and balance boards. Balance exercises can be useful in animals recovering from surgery. The animal is forced to place weight on the surgical repair, building muscle in the affected area. These exercises can also be helpful for animals with neurological conditions. For example, an animal recovering from a stroke has decreased coordination and balance which can be improved through a physical therapy regime that includes balance exercises.[11]

Coordination exercises[edit]

Coordination exercises help improve an animal's awareness of its surroundings. Such exercises include cavalettis, weaves, and figure eights. Cavaletti is an exercise that gives an animal obstacles to walk over. This exercise makes the animal focus on where each foot is being placed and builds coordination. Weaves and figure eights help to build coordination and strength by forcing the animal to shift its weight quickly from one side to the other as it turns. These exercises are very useful in dogs suffering from neurological conditions and spinal cord injuries.[12]

Strengthening exercises[edit]

These exercises include uphill and downhill walking, stairs, standing on 2 or 3 legs, ramps, and sit-to-stands. Uphill and downhill walking are effective physical therapy techniques for increasing flexion of the hip joint. This is a good technique for stretching the hip joint and increasing range of motion in dogs with hip dysplasia and degenerative joint disease. Walking up and down stairs forces an animal's weight to shift fully onto its front or hind legs and builds muscle in the shoulders and thighs, respectively. A simple but effective strengthening exercise for animals with surgical repairs is to force an animal to place more weight than they would normally on the affected limb by lifting the opposite leg. If the physical therapist is attempting to build muscle in the right hind leg, they lift the left hind leg to shift weight onto the right hind leg. To increase the difficulty of this exercise they lift both the right front and left hind legs. Ramps work similarly to uphill and downhill walking. The angle of the ramp can be altered to increase or decrease difficulty. Sit-to-stands work similarly to squats in humans. The animal is asked to sit square on its haunches and is then encouraged to push off its hind legs to stand up. This exercise increases strength in the thigh and stifle joint of an animal.[13][14]

Hydrotherapy[edit]

Hydrotherapy techniques use water as a tool to improve muscle and joint function in animals. These techniques include but are not limited to swimming and underwater treadmill. Swimming allows an animal to work several muscles at once while stretching further than walking on land would allow. This helps to build muscle and endurance and is a technique that minimizes stress on the joints. Underwater treadmill is used commonly in animal physical therapy. It provides the benefits of land exercises while decreasing the weight placed on the animal’s limbs. Underwater treadmill and swimming can be very useful in dogs recovering from surgery, such as anterior cruciate ligament and cranial cruciate ligamentrepairs and break repairs.[15][16]

Electrical Stimulation[edit]

Electrical stimulation techniques uses electrical currents to either stimulate muscles or to combat pain. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is often used to help improve muscle strength, and/or motor recruitment. Trans-cutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) can be used to help relieve the pain that the animal may be experiencing. These techniques are used along with the other techniques listed above.[17]

References[edit]

  1. Jump up^ Hellyer P, Rodan I, Brunt J, Downing R, Hagedorn J, Robertson S. 2007. AAHA/AAFP Pain Management guidelines for dogs and cats. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 43:235-248.
  2. Jump up^ Rivera PL. 2007. Canine Rehabilitation Therapies I and II. Proceedings of the 79th Annual Western Veterinary Conference; 2007 Feb 18-22; Las Vegas. 11p.
  3. Jump up^ Mlacnik E, Bockstahler B, Muller M, Tetrick M, Nap R, Zentek J. 2006. Effects of caloric restriction and a moderate or intense physiotherapy program for treatment of lameness in overweight dogs with osteoarthritis. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 229(11):1756-1760.
  4. Jump up^ Rivera PL. 2007. Canine Rehabilitation Therapies I and II. Proceedings of the 79th Annual Western Veterinary Conference; 2007 Feb 18-22; Las Vegas. 11p.
  5. Jump up^ http://www.utcaninerehab.com/
  6. Jump up^ Rivera PL. 2007. Canine Rehabilitation Therapies I and II. Proceedings of the 79th Annual Western Veterinary Conference; 2007 Feb 18-22; Las Vegas. 11p.
  7. Jump up^ Rivera PL. 2007. Canine Rehabilitation Therapies I and II. Proceedings of the 79th Annual Western Veterinary Conference; 2007 Feb 18-22; Las Vegas. 11p.
  8. Jump up^ Rivera PL. 2007. Canine Rehabilitation Therapies I and II. Proceedings of the 79th Annual Western Veterinary Conference; 2007 Feb 18-22; Las Vegas. 11p.
  9. Jump up^ Crook T, McGowan C, Pead M. 2007. Effect of passive stretching on the range of motion of osteoarthritic joints in 10 Labrador retrievers. Vet Rec. 160(16):545-547.
  10. Jump up^ Rivera PL. 2007. Canine Rehabilitation Therapies I and II. Proceedings of the 79th Annual Western Veterinary Conference; 2007 Feb 18-22; Las Vegas. 11p.
  11. Jump up^ Rivera PL. 2007. Canine Rehabilitation Therapies I and II. Proceedings of the 79th Annual Western Veterinary Conference; 2007 Feb 18-22; Las Vegas. 11p.
  12. Jump up^ Holler P, Brazda V, Dal-Bianco B, Lewy E, Mueller M, Peham C, Bockstahler B. 2010. Kinematic motion analysis of the joints of the forelimbs and hind limbs of dogs during walking exercise regimens. Am J Vet Res. 71(7):734-740.
  13. Jump up^ Holler P, Brazda V, Dal-Bianco B, Lewy E, Mueller M, Peham C, Bockstahler B. 2010. Kinematic motion analysis of the joints of the forelimbs and hind limbs of dogs during walking exercise regimens. Am J Vet Res. 71(7):734-740.
  14. Jump up^ Rivera PL. 2007. Canine Rehabilitation Therapies I and II. Proceedings of the 79th Annual Western Veterinary Conference; 2007 Feb 18-22; Las Vegas. 11p.
  15. Jump up^ Jurek C, McCauley L. [Updated 2010]. Underwater treadmill therapy in veterinary practice: Benefits and considerations. DVM 360. Available from:http://veterinarymedicine.dvm360.com/vetmed/ArticleStandard/Article/detail/591380.
  16. Jump up^ Rivera PL. 2007. Canine Rehabilitation Therapies I and II. Proceedings of the 79th Annual Western Veterinary Conference; 2007 Feb 18-22; Las Vegas. 11p.
  17. Jump up^ Mills D, Levine D. Canine Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy, 2e 2013. p342-53

Veterinary E-courses - Free and fee based

VetMedTeam
Online free and fee-based courses for technicians and veterinarians including personal development, client services, medical and clinical continuing education, behavior, practice management and medical procedures.  View full list of online courses

Royal Veterinary College - eCPD
Introductory to cutting-edge online courses in veterinary medicine and surgery for veterinarians and veterinary nurses who want to combine their busy professional schedule with continuing professional development.  View full list of online courses

Centre for Veterinary Education
Centre for Veterinary Education is an established and recognised leader in continuing veterinary education and provides up-to-date education and information to veterinarians, vet nurses, technicians, carers, support staff and all those involved in the care of animals.   View full list of online courses

CPD Solutions
High quality attendance courses in all areas of Small Animal, Farm Animal and Equine medicine and surgery.   View full list of online courses

Master of Veterinary Medicine (MVM) Distance Programme Massey University
Massey University's Master of Veterinary Medicine (MVM) programme provides continuing education for practicing veterinarians, delivered by distance. It gives you the opportunity to complete a formal qualification or study an individual course for interest.  View full list of online courses

Sunday 7 September 2014

Comparison of blood profiles between healthy and Brucella affected cattle

8. Comparison of blood profiles between healthy and Brucella affected cattle - Rita Nath, Sutopa Das, Satya Sarma and Maitrayee Devi
Veterinary World, 7(9): 668-670


   doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2014.668-670


Rita Nath: Department of Veterinary Biochemistry, College of Veterinary Science, Khanapara, Guwahati, Assam, India; ritasankr@rediffmail.com
Sutopa Das: Department of Microbiology, College of Veterinary Science, Khanapara, Guwahati, Assam, India; d_sutopa@yahoo.com
Satya Sarma: Department of Veterinary Biochemistry, College of Veterinary Science, Khanapara, Guwahati, Assam, India; sarmasatya49@yahoo.in
Maitrayee Devi: Department of Microbiology, College of Veterinary Science, Khanapara, Guwahati, Assam, India; maitrayeee@gmail.com
Received: 23-05-2014, Revised: 20-07-2014, Accepted: 27-07-2014, Published online: 07-09-2014
Corresponding author: Rita Nath, email: ritasankr@rediffmail.com


Aim: The present investigation was undertaken to evaluate the blood biochemical metabolites of crossbred cattle suffering from brucellosis, in Khetri region of Kamrup District of Assam, India.
Materials and Methods: Blood was collected by venipuncture from the jugular vein using 18 gauge hypodermic needle fitted to a Vacutainer-Leur adapter and evacuated tubes. Samples were screened for Brucella by rose Bengal plate test using plate test antigen. The study consisted of two groups. Group I consisted of healthy crossbred cows and Group II consisted of crossbred cows affected with brucellosis. Blood metabolites were estimated by spectrophotometric methods.
Results: Out of 14 serum samples, 8 samples were positive for Brucella and remaining 6 were found to be negative. It was observed that serum albumin and urea of the affected cattle showed a significant decrease (p<0.05), but serum globulin, cholesterol, triglyceride, aspartate transaminase, and alanine transaminase activities were significantly increased (p<0.05) in comparison to the healthy cattle. Glucose, protein, albumin: globulin ratio, blood urea nitrogen did not show much variation between the Brucellosis affected and healthy cattle.
Conclusion: Results obtained showed that brucellosis have a harmful effect on the animals health as they disturb the vital organs functions, which appear in the form of changes in blood biochemical parameters.

Keywords: biochemical metabolites, brucellosis, cattle, rose Bengal plate test.

Seroprevalence of canine dirofilariosis, granulocytic anaplasmosis and lyme borreliosis of public health importance in dogs from India’s North East

7. Seroprevalence of canine dirofilariosis, granulocytic anaplasmosis and lyme borreliosis of public health importance in dogs from India’s North East S. K. Borthakur, D. K. Deka, Kanta Bhattacharjee and P. C. Sarmah
Veterinary World, 7(9): 665-667


   doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2014.665-667


S. K. Borthakur: Department of Parasitology, College of Veterinary Science, Assam Agricultural University, Khanapara, Guwahati, Assam, India;sanjoy_barthakur@rediffmail.com
D. K. Deka: Department of Parasitology, College of Veterinary Science, Assam Agricultural University, Khanapara, Guwahati, Assam, India;dilipkumar.deka@rediffmail.com
Kanta Bhattacharjee: Department of Parasitology, College of Veterinary Science, Assam Agricultural University, Khanapara, Guwahati, Assam, India;kantabhatta@gmail.com
P. C. Sarmah: Department of Parasitology, College of Veterinary Science, Assam Agricultural University, Khanapara, Guwahati, Assam, India;pcsarmah@gmail.com

Received: 02-05-2014, Revised: 21-07-2014, Accepted: 25-07-2014, Published online: 07-09-2014

Corresponding author: Kanta Bhattacharjee, email: kantabhatta@gmail.com


Aim: Vector-borne infections namely dirofilariosis, ehrlichiosis, anaplasmosis and lyme borreliosis are being recognized as emerging and/or re-emerging problems in dogs and man due to rapid extension of zoogeographical ranges of many causative agents through international tourism and increase mobility of dogs at national and international level towards meeting the demand for companion animals in the present day society. Anticipating such situation, a serological study was conducted in dogs from North East India to estimate the prevalence of zoonotically important Dirofilaria immitisAnaplasma phagocytophilum and Borrelia burgdorferi along with Ehrlichia canis.
Materials and Methods: Serological study was carried out using enzyme immunoassay in commercial SNAP 4DX® test kit (Idexx Laboratories, USA). The study was conducted in 191 dogs comprising 82 pets, 57 stray and 52 working dogs owned by defence organizations.
Results: The study revealed seroprevalence of mosquito-borne D. immitis (17.80%), tick-borne E. canis (22.51%) and A. phagocytophilum(4.71%) with an overall 41.88% prevalence of pathogens in single or co-infection. Serological evidence of tick-borne lyme borreliosis due toB. burgdorferi could not be established in dogs in the present study. Of the zoonotic species, highest prevalence of D. immitis was found in the stray dogs (22.80%) and that of A. phagocytophilum in pet dogs (6.09%).
Conclusion: The results of the present serological study serve as baseline information on the prevalence of A. phagocytophilum in dogs reported for the first time in India and reaffirmation on the high prevalence of D. immitis and E. canis in the North East India.

Keywords: Anaplasma phagocytophilumBorrelia burgdorferidogDirofilaria immitisEhrlichia canis.

Prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in stray and owned dogs of Grenada, West Indies

6Prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in stray and owned dogs of Grenada, West Indies - Ravindra N. Sharma, Gabriel Ordas, Keshaw Tiwari, Alfred Chikweto, Muhammad Iqbal Bhaiyat, Claude De Allie and Tara Paterson
Veterinary World, 7(9): 661-664


   doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2014.661-664


Ravindra N. Sharma: Department of Pathobiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, St. Georges University, Grenada, West Indies; rsharma@sgu.edu
Gabriel Ordas: Department of Pathobiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, St. Georges University, Grenada, West Indies;
gordas@sgu.edu
Keshaw Tiwari: Department of Pathobiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, St. Georges University, Grenada, West Indies;
ktiwari@sgu.edu
Alfred Chikweto: Department of Pathobiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, St. Georges University, Grenada, West Indies; achikweto@sgu.edu
Muhammad Iqbal Bhaiyat: Department of Pathobiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, St. Georges University, Grenada, West Indies;mibhaiyat@sgu.edu
Claude De Allie: Division of Veterinary Services, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Government of Grenada, West Indies; cdeallie@sgu.edu
Tara Paterson: Department of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, School of Veterinary Medicine, St. Georges University, Grenada, West Indies;tpaterson@sgu.edu
Received: 21-05-2014, Revised: 18-07-2014, Accepted: 25-07-2014, Published online: 07-09-2014
Corresponding author: Ravindra N. Sharma, email: rsharma@sgu.edu


Aim: This serological survey was undertaken to estimate the prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in two populations of dogs (stray and owned dogs) in Grenada. Dogs get infected with oocysts voided from cats, definitive hosts of T. gondii. In dogs, T. gondii causes subclinical to clinical disease. Earlier studies conducted in Grenada on a small population of owned dogs showed evidence of exposure to T. gondii.
Materials and Methods: Antibodies to T. gondii were determined in serum samples from 625 dogs (368 stray and 257 owned dogs) from around all six parishes in Grenada, West Indies, using an indirect enzyme linked immunosorbent assay.
Results: Antibodies to T. gondii were found in 123 (33.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 28.58-38.22%) of stray dogs and in 64 (25%; 95% CI: 19.71-30.29%) of the owned dogs. Seropositivity was higher in stray dogs than in pet dogs (p=0.026). Whereas, there was no sex predisposition to seropositivity in owned dogs (p=1.0), female stray dogs showed a higher prevalence than male stray dogs (p=0.04).
Conclusion: These results support previous findings that T. gondii is prevalent in Grenada. In this study, overall seropositivity for T. gondiiin dogs in Grenada is lower than noted in 2008, but is still higher in stray dogs than in owned dogs.

Keywords: dog, ELISA, Grenada, T. gondii.